This particular post can be used as a general forum to add comments, thoughts, or updates that aren't related to any central thread or aren't significant enough for their own space. That way we can avoid numerous emails and have all past remarks amassed in a central location.
I labeled this "Discussion" so that, to return to it, one simply needs to click the "Discussion" link on the right (as far as I can tell—I'm still new to the blogger interface).
I labeled this "Discussion" so that, to return to it, one simply needs to click the "Discussion" link on the right (as far as I can tell—I'm still new to the blogger interface).
From Yardenne, via email:
ReplyDeleteHey Guys,
Shai and I are on our way to Israel for a long weekend, and will be back on Sunday morning. It suddenly occurred to me that, contrary to what I thought, we'd be on the road till Sunday afternoon, so I won't be able to Skype in on the workshop. I am reading Kevin's manuscript, though, so I'll be able to send him my comments. Will be sorry to miss you guys!
xo
Hey, guys, I know the hurricane was a bit of a distraction (ok, that may be an understatement) and I hope that all you and your apartments made it through unscathed. I was wondering if we ever came to a conclusion about who is submitting next? Karen? Scott? Do we need to skip a meeting and postpone submissions? What's going on with that?
ReplyDeleteHi! Sorry for not keeping you guys up to date. Scott is going to send something today, but needed a few days due to illness etc.
ReplyDeleteJust sent it. Sorry for the short notice. This has been a rough week. Let me know if you'd like a hard copy and we can figure something out.
ReplyDeleteI've been thinking about the schedule lately (really only for about 5 minutes or so) and I was wondering if it might be in all of our best interests to set specific alternating submission expectations for each person. I was mostly thinking about the benefit of a deadline and how nice it is to know that one's beholden to a future date so that writing is done more efficiently. Would this go against the somewhat liberal "submit when you've got something" ethos we've kind of got going? Or would it help to say something like for example Dave (Dave doesn't exist) submits every 6th round or something like that? What does everyone think? Does that make sense?
ReplyDeleteHey Scott, let's talk about this today at the meeting. I honestly think it could work fine either way (I feel like there's a natural order appears after a while regardless of wether we plan it or not, just so everyone gets a chance to go fairly frequently), but I'd like to see how others feel.
Delete